From EncyclopAtys
m |
m |
||
| Line 48: | Line 48: | ||
=='''<big>Edition</big>'''== | =='''<big>Edition</big>'''== | ||
| + | [[File:EN wiki history comparing.png|thumb]] [[File:EN wiki history see.png|thumb]] With the exception of archived documents and documents with the official status of “final document” (Lore, Chronicle), everything can be improved and this is one of the riches of wikis. | ||
| + | |||
| + | Nevertheless, certain rules of constructive conviviality must be respected. | ||
| + | |||
| + | First of all, it is necessary to assess whether or not the changes are significant. There are no rules and it's more of a feeling, but if the change is drastic, it's wise to start by looking at the page's history (button next to “Edit”). If the content (not the form, look, spelling…) has not changed for some time, we can assume that its author left it for this and that the document may have aged, that it may need updating. An example is shown opposite. | ||
| + | |||
| + | An update can be considered drastic when it deletes paragraphs or even lines that are fundamental to the development of the topic. In this case it becomes appropriate to leave a message in the “User Discussion:xyz” page. While waiting for his answer (one week?), it is wise to keep in the modified page the original text passed as a comment. The easiest way to pass a text as a comment is to preface it with '''<code><nowiki><!--</nowiki></code>''' and to follow it with '''<code><nowiki>--></nowiki></code>'''. But there are sometimes issues, especially if there are already other comments. In this case, the hammer and chisel can be used by framing the text with '''<code><nowiki><noinclude><includeonly></nowiki></code>''' and '''<code><nowiki></includeonly></noinclude></nowiki></code>'''. Why such a complication? Because it is always necessary to respect the writings of an author and his intellectual authorship, even in free software world. Otherwise, we run the risk of a: | ||
Revision as of 23:33, 9 June 2019
 Translation Status → This page is one of the 25 we would like to see translated into English.
|
 Im Übersetzung im Gange •  Translation in progress •  Traducción requerida •  Original •  Не переведено
|
A short technical guide for experienced contributors and documentation managers.
Working as a team
Never forget that any document (except protected pages, accessible only to administrators) can be edited at any time by anyone. See below (Edition puis Content Validation) for good practices to be followed.
Talk pages
It is often useful, convenient or necessary to leave a message to someone else. For that purpose a “Talk” page is associated with each document when it is created, for example here: Talk:Wiki Technical Guide [[Talk:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]].
In any case, you must try to maintain something readable, so each topic will start with a title ===Title of the topic==. It is better to have fifty small separate subjects, each with a title, than a single package of fifty subjects. This facilitates discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc.
At the end of the subject, always sign with ~~~~. This immediately lets anyone know who posted the message and when.
Usually, responses are made by indenting as in emails. This is done by opening the line with one more : than the previous part. Obviously each answer, each rebound will be signed. This is very useful for someone who will ask the same questions later on and who will thus see this discussion as part of a “Knowledge Base”.
Last, it may be useful to attach to the title a ✓ to indicate that the subject is closed ==Title of the topic {{OK}}==. If the subject has to be reopened, the ✓ can be replaced by a ✗ {{KO}}.
Unfortunately, those concerned by the question are not necessarily informed (the number of articles monitored - and therefore likely to have their changes notified - is capped so as not to blow up the database). Thus, also think about preventing the person or persons who may be concerned by the discussion by indicating the link to the discussion. Again, title and signature, even if very short, are welcome.
Sponsorship
At first glance we will notice that if the Wiki is easy at writing, it is heavy to manage with all its rules of conviviality and efficiency, its traditions built on the experience of its predecessors, etc. This because the wiki also has its “Lore” (oral tradition).
Do you really want to get involved in the wiki? So don't hesitate to be sponsored, without embarrassment, shyness or shame... We have all made our debut, and perhaps, hopefully, it will be up to you to sponsor later on. You don't know anyone? Try to contact “alumni” on https://chat.ryzom.com/channel/pj-ryzom_wiki or contact them from Special:ActiveUsers.
Translations
There are four rules that coexist:
- • Forge (development part), Game behaviour chart, Graphic chart, Fundamental categories
- everything must be translated into English to be accessible to as many people as possible, whose majority more or less understand written English;
- • In-Game Behavior Chart, Graphic Chart, Wiki Management Templates, Fundamental Categories
- everything must be translated into all languages;
- • Lore, Chronicles, Public events
- everything must be translated into at least Ryzom's three “mother tongues”: DE, EN and FR;
- • the rest and especially the roleplay parts
- there are no rules, only players' and translators' concerns prevail.
Edition
With the exception of archived documents and documents with the official status of “final document” (Lore, Chronicle), everything can be improved and this is one of the riches of wikis.
Nevertheless, certain rules of constructive conviviality must be respected.
First of all, it is necessary to assess whether or not the changes are significant. There are no rules and it's more of a feeling, but if the change is drastic, it's wise to start by looking at the page's history (button next to “Edit”). If the content (not the form, look, spelling…) has not changed for some time, we can assume that its author left it for this and that the document may have aged, that it may need updating. An example is shown opposite.
An update can be considered drastic when it deletes paragraphs or even lines that are fundamental to the development of the topic. In this case it becomes appropriate to leave a message in the “User Discussion:xyz” page. While waiting for his answer (one week?), it is wise to keep in the modified page the original text passed as a comment. The easiest way to pass a text as a comment is to preface it with <!-- and to follow it with -->. But there are sometimes issues, especially if there are already other comments. In this case, the hammer and chisel can be used by framing the text with <noinclude><includeonly> and </includeonly></noinclude>. Why such a complication? Because it is always necessary to respect the writings of an author and his intellectual authorship, even in free software world. Otherwise, we run the risk of a:
