From EncyclopAtys
m (→Easy to discriminate?) |
(→Preventing discussion by indicating the link?: new section) |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
{{quotation||This facilitates discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc.}} | {{quotation||This facilitates discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc.}} | ||
Really? It sounds like: "This (Writing 50 titles instead of 1 title for 50 topics) make it easy to discriminate responses in consideration, implementation, etc."<br>Better: "This prevent discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc." Or what should there be said?<br>--[[:de:User:Heernis|Heernis]] ([[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Heernis|talks]]) 30. June 2019 - 14:22 | Really? It sounds like: "This (Writing 50 titles instead of 1 title for 50 topics) make it easy to discriminate responses in consideration, implementation, etc."<br>Better: "This prevent discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc." Or what should there be said?<br>--[[:de:User:Heernis|Heernis]] ([[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Heernis|talks]]) 30. June 2019 - 14:22 | ||
+ | |||
+ | == Preventing discussion by indicating the link? == | ||
+ | |||
+ | {{Quotation||Thus, also think about preventing the person or persons who may be concerned by the discussion by indicating the link to the discussion.}} This sound weird. Should be rewritten. (Think more simple ;-) )<br>--[[:de:User:Heernis|Heernis]] ([[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Heernis|talks]]) 30. June 2019 - 14:35 |
Revision as of 15:35, 30 June 2019
EN translation in progress.
New(?) templates
I created Template:OK (✓) and Template:KO (✗), but I am wondering if those don't already exist with an other name. If they do, please let me know. Maupas (talk) 00:33, 9 June 2019 (CEST)
Easy to discriminate?
“This facilitates discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc.
Really? It sounds like: "This (Writing 50 titles instead of 1 title for 50 topics) make it easy to discriminate responses in consideration, implementation, etc."
Better: "This prevent discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc." Or what should there be said?
--Heernis (talks) 30. June 2019 - 14:22
Preventing discussion by indicating the link?
This sound weird. Should be rewritten. (Think more simple ;-) )“Thus, also think about preventing the person or persons who may be concerned by the discussion by indicating the link to the discussion.
--Heernis (talks) 30. June 2019 - 14:35