Difference between revisions of "Talk:Wiki Technical Guide"
From EncyclopAtys
(→Easy to discriminate?) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
==New(?) templates== | ==New(?) templates== | ||
I created [[Template:OK]] ({{OK}}) and [[Template:KO]] ({{KO}}), but I am wondering if those don't already exist with an other name. If they do, please let me know. [[User:Maupas|Maupas]] ([[User talk:Maupas|talk]]) 00:33, 9 June 2019 (CEST) | I created [[Template:OK]] ({{OK}}) and [[Template:KO]] ({{KO}}), but I am wondering if those don't already exist with an other name. If they do, please let me know. [[User:Maupas|Maupas]] ([[User talk:Maupas|talk]]) 00:33, 9 June 2019 (CEST) | ||
| Line 16: | Line 14: | ||
{{Quotation||Thus, also think about preventing the person or persons who may be concerned by the discussion by indicating the link to the discussion.}} This sound weird. Should be rewritten. (Think more simple ;-) )<br>--[[:de:User:Heernis|Heernis]] ([[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Heernis|talks]]) 30. June 2019 - 14:35 | {{Quotation||Thus, also think about preventing the person or persons who may be concerned by the discussion by indicating the link to the discussion.}} This sound weird. Should be rewritten. (Think more simple ;-) )<br>--[[:de:User:Heernis|Heernis]] ([[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Heernis|talks]]) 30. June 2019 - 14:35 | ||
| + | :I replaced the "weird" sentence as follows: | ||
| + | :“''So, please warn the ones you think concerned by the discussion by adding the link to the discussion in their own discussion user page.''” | ||
| + | :Feel free to improve it, tough! | ||
| + | :[[User:Maupas|Maupas]] ([[User talk:Maupas|talk]]) 17:33, 30 June 2019 (CEST) | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 30 June 2019
New(?) templates
I created Template:OK (✓) and Template:KO (✗), but I am wondering if those don't already exist with an other name. If they do, please let me know. Maupas (talk) 00:33, 9 June 2019 (CEST)
Easy to discriminate?
“This facilitates discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc.
Really? It sounds like: "This (Writing 50 titles instead of 1 title for 50 topics) make it easy to discriminate responses in consideration, implementation, etc."
Better: "This prevent discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc." Or what should there be said?
--Heernis (talks) 30. June 2019 - 14:22
- Of the french text written by Zorroagh I understood that the one who want to modify, (or ask/answer questions about, or translate) some topic will find and work on this topic more easily if it is a short one. Hence my "faithful" translation of "Cela facilite les réponses discriminées dans leur prise en compte, leur réalisation, etc."
- But I agree that this point of view is questionable (after all, sections are not so difficult to reach and work on) and suspects the main reason for such a recommendation (systematical splitting of articles) is the difficulties encountered in implementation of wikis in WebIG.
- More, your question raise the point of translation. In fact, as I'am not a native EN speaker, the present EN Wiki Technical Guide need to be checked by somebody who is AND understands FR enough (you know that's how we work in Translation Team). I don't know if we have among ourselves wikis contributors such a person but I think we could at least add a status reading "Proofreading requested" in the TIP template. What do you think?
- Maupas (talk) 17:16, 30 June 2019 (CEST)
Preventing discussion by indicating the link?
This sound weird. Should be rewritten. (Think more simple ;-) )“Thus, also think about preventing the person or persons who may be concerned by the discussion by indicating the link to the discussion.
--Heernis (talks) 30. June 2019 - 14:35
