(→Easy to discriminate?) |
m (→Easy to discriminate? {{OK}}) |
||
(3 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
:::;First point: I realize that, in my answer to Heernis, I just forgot the context (which is not of '''all''' pages but only of '''talk''' pages). So, I think '''your''' answer will be more understandable by Heernis than mine. Grytt :-). | :::;First point: I realize that, in my answer to Heernis, I just forgot the context (which is not of '''all''' pages but only of '''talk''' pages). So, I think '''your''' answer will be more understandable by Heernis than mine. Grytt :-). | ||
:::;Second point: This one came to my mind precisely because of my misunderstanding of the context, and, though I totally agree with you as for solutions of the WebIG issue, it have not to be raised here. Sorry again :-( | :::;Second point: This one came to my mind precisely because of my misunderstanding of the context, and, though I totally agree with you as for solutions of the WebIG issue, it have not to be raised here. Sorry again :-( | ||
− | :::::No prob, Maupas, you just gave the demonstration of cutting a problem in little slice to solve it easier :) | + | :::::No prob, Maupas, you just gave the demonstration of cutting a problem in little slice to solve it easier :) Demonstration is always better then speech ;) I suppose we can close with a '''{{OK}}''' -- [[User:Zorroargh|Zo'ro-Argh]] <sup><small>[[User talk:Zorroargh|Woren Siloy]]</small></sup> 20:32, 30 June 2019 (CEST) |
:::--[[User:Maupas|Maupas]] ([[User talk:Maupas|talk]]) 20:03, 30 June 2019 (CEST) | :::--[[User:Maupas|Maupas]] ([[User talk:Maupas|talk]]) 20:03, 30 June 2019 (CEST) | ||
+ | :::: I guess you both didn't understand. But I've found the error in my head. "discriminate" have 2 meanings: "differentiate" and "be prejudiced". As German was thinking of "diskriminieren" in the manner of "prejudge" because there is no word for "distinguish" called like that it have always a negative meaning. So I was thinking: "It facilitates to be prejudged". Good to know, but I should describe my topics better. It was a question about translation i do offline in German. Nothing more. | ||
+ | ::::--[[:de:User:Heernis|Heernis]] ([[:de:Benutzer_Diskussion:Heernis|talks]]) 30. June 2019 - 22:44 | ||
+ | |||
+ | === Some other reasons to slit an article into several shorts one: === | ||
+ | # '''categories'''. You can much more have very precise categories. For ex, [[Chat/RC FAQ]] is for all users, but [[Chat/Translation in RC]] (previously in RC FAQ) is for teams only => Translation in RC can have teams categories related. (and you can get the content of an article within an other one => the reader won't see any difference, when using '''noinclude''' wiki tags). | ||
+ | # important text, '''easier to maintain'''. For ex, for a new features, you would want to add it on several pages, and need to update several pages if it changed (for ex: DeepL translations in IG channel). Better create an short article, import it inside the pages: when it will change, you just update the short one, and all pages will be updated (using '''noinclude''' wiki tags). | ||
+ | ::::: --CraftJenn, Ranger du Cercle du Bois d'Almati ([https://chat.ryzom.com/direct/Craftjenn sur RC]) 11:39, 12 April 2020 (CEST) | ||
== Preventing discussion by indicating the link? == | == Preventing discussion by indicating the link? == |
I created Template:OK (✓) and Template:KO (✗), but I am wondering if those don't already exist with an other name. If they do, please let me know. Maupas (talk) 00:33, 9 June 2019 (CEST)
“This facilitates discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc.
Really? It sounds like: "This (Writing 50 titles instead of 1 title for 50 topics) make it easy to discriminate responses in consideration, implementation, etc."
Better: "This prevent discriminated responses in their consideration, implementation, etc." Or what should there be said?
--Heernis (talks) 30. June 2019 - 14:22
This sound weird. Should be rewritten. (Think more simple ;-) )“Thus, also think about preventing the person or persons who may be concerned by the discussion by indicating the link to the discussion.